Ocugen, Inc. OCGN (last ticker on record)
CIK 1372299Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- 95% wipeout
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Apr 2024
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Dec 2014 to Dec 2018
- Law firms
- 11
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Feb 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLPFirst linked Aug 2020 · Named in a filing · 154 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Jun 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Gunderson DettmerFirst linked Feb 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 333 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
- Pepper HamiltonFirst linked Feb 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 340 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Katten Muchin Rosenman LLPFirst linked Jun 2019 · Text search only · 268 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 0.58× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Jun 2019 · Text search only · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Schulte Roth & ZabelFirst linked Jun 2019 · Text search only · 296 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Hogan Lovells US LLPFirst linked Nov 2014 · Text search only · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Brown RudnickFirst linked Feb 2014 · Text search only · 137 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.90× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- O Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Feb 2014 · Text search only · 589 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.25× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goodwin Procter | Feb 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP | Aug 2020 | Named in a filing | 154 | 1.18 | 0.00 | 1.15 |
| Morgan Lewis | Jun 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.02 |
| Gunderson Dettmer | Feb 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 333 | 1.17 | 0.66 | 1.32 |
| Pepper Hamilton | Feb 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 340 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 1.13 |
| Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP | Jun 2019 | Text search only | 268 | 0.76 | 0.58 | 1.22 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Jun 2019 | Text search only | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.80 |
| Schulte Roth & Zabel | Jun 2019 | Text search only | 296 | 0.93 | 0.44 | 0.99 |
| Hogan Lovells US LLP | Nov 2014 | Text search only | 487 | 0.96 | 0.26 | 0.85 |
| Brown Rudnick | Feb 2014 | Text search only | 137 | 0.84 | 0.90 | 0.97 |
| O Melveny & Myers LLP | Feb 2014 | Text search only | 589 | 1.07 | 0.25 | 1.07 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jennifer L. PorterGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Mar 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Rachael M. BusheyGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Mar 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- James W. McKenzie Jr.Morgan LewisFirst linked Jun 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.70×
- Albert VanderlaanOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Oct 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Keith J. SchererGunderson DettmerFirst linked Feb 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.55× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Marc F. DuprGunderson DettmerFirst linked Feb 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.67×
- Richard C. BlakeGunderson DettmerFirst linked Feb 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.22× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Brian E. CovottaBrobeck, Phleger & Harrison LLPFirst linked Feb 2014 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.22×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jennifer L. PorterGoodwin Procter | Mar 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.03 |
| Rachael M. BusheyGoodwin Procter | Mar 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 28 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.97 |
| James W. McKenzie Jr.Morgan Lewis | Jun 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 35 | 0.71 | 0.00 | 2.70 |
| Albert VanderlaanOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Oct 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 29 | 0.95 | 0.00 | 0.93 |
| Keith J. SchererGunderson Dettmer | Feb 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 0.55 | 0.00 | 0.85 |
| Marc F. DuprGunderson Dettmer | Feb 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 1.67 |
| Richard C. BlakeGunderson Dettmer | Feb 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 39 | 1.22 | 0.00 | 1.06 |
| Brian E. CovottaBrobeck, Phleger & Harrison LLP | Feb 2014 | Text search only | 7 | 1.14 | 0.00 | 2.22 |