Florida Bank Group, Inc.
CIK 1370914Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jan 2011
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- DLA PiperFirst linked Jan 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Dewey & LeBoeuf LLPFirst linked Oct 2009 · Text search only · 126 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.60× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.15×
- Fowler WhiteFirst linked Oct 2009 · Text search only · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 2.97× · 95% wipeout 2.08×
- Smith MackinnonFirst linked Oct 2009 · Text search only · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.82×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DLA Piper | Jan 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Dewey & LeBoeuf LLP | Oct 2009 | Text search only | 126 | 1.60 | 0.00 | 0.15 |
| Fowler White | Oct 2009 | Text search only | 18 | 0.00 | 2.97 | 2.08 |
| Smith Mackinnon | Oct 2009 | Text search only | 26 | 0.76 | 0.00 | 2.82 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Michael P. ReedCovington & BurlingFirst linked Jan 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.21×
- John P. GreeleySmith MackinnonFirst linked Oct 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael P. ReedCovington & Burling | Jan 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 36 | 0.68 | 0.00 | 0.21 |
| John P. GreeleySmith Mackinnon | Oct 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 23 | 0.78 | 0.00 | 1.24 |