China Biologic Products Holdings, Inc. CBPO (last ticker on record)

CIK 1369868Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)

Delisting notice (not a red flag)
Restatement

These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.

Red flags: 1; Newest began Mar 2011
Largest fall in its shares: —; None of 95% on record
Law firms: 11; Linked to 5 or more companies
Lawyers: 15; Linked to 5 or more companies

What happened

Mar 31, 2011Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Feb 4, 2010Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)

An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.

Law firms

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Law firms linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Davis Polk	Jul 2017	Named in a filing	1,694	1.26	0.06	1.02
Maples and Calder	Jul 2017	Named in a filing	1,144	0.95	0.26	0.92
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati	Jul 2012	Named in SEC correspondence	1,468	1.09	0.60	1.42
Pillsbury Winthrop	Jul 2009	Named in SEC correspondence	516	1.13	0.82	1.27
Thelen Reid Brown Raysman & Steiner LLP	Sep 2007	Named in SEC correspondence	54	0.75	1.63	1.56
Harney Westwood & Riegels	Feb 2020	Text search only	238	1.34	1.02	0.76
Kirkland & Ellis	Feb 2020	Text search only	1,686	0.98	0.17	0.87
Latham & Watkins LLP	Feb 2020	Text search only	2,667	0.98	0.31	1.10
Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP	Jan 2020	Text search only	1,051	1.31	0.27	0.91
Bryan Cave	Sep 2007	Text search only	471	1.09	0.76	0.98
Loeb & Loeb LLP	Sep 2007	Text search only	838	0.92	0.99	1.10

Lawyers

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Lawyers linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Dan OuyangWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati	Jun 2015	Named in a filing	41	1.30	2.59	1.68
Steven V. BernardWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati	Jun 2015	Named in a filing	40	0.96	0.00	1.11
Julia ReigelWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati	Jun 2014	Named in SEC correspondence	29	1.54	0.00	0.74
Nathaniel P. GallonWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati	Jul 2012	Named in a filing	8	0.00	0.00	0.00
Howard ZhangDavis Polk	Jun 2010	Named in a filing	25	1.31	0.00	0.81
Dawn Bernd-SchulzPillsbury Winthrop	Oct 2009	Named in SEC correspondence	12	0.66	1.89	1.71
Joseph R. TianoPillsbury Winthrop	Oct 2007	Named in SEC correspondence	27	0.79	3.08	1.14
Louis A. BevilacquaBevilacqua PLLC	Oct 2007	Named in SEC correspondence	103	0.92	1.97	1.30
Thomas M. ShoesmithPillsbury Winthrop	Sep 2007	Named in SEC correspondence	23	1.08	2.68	1.41
Gary LiPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison	Feb 2020	Text search only	6	1.86	0.00	0.95
Jie Zhu	Feb 2020	Text search only	5	0.00	0.00	0.79
Tim GardnerWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP	Jan 2020	Text search only	9	1.15	0.00	0.00
Denise ShiuCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton	Sep 2019	Text search only	10	0.00	0.00	0.00
Christopher H. CunninghamPreston Gates & Ellis	Jul 2014	Text search only	20	0.38	0.00	1.28
Mitchell S. NussbaumLoeb & Loeb LLP	Sep 2007	Text search only	391	0.98	0.93	1.21