Shiner International, Inc. BEST (last ticker on record)
CIK 1369774Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 1
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Stevens & LeeFirst linked Feb 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 127 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.74× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Hale Lane Peek Dennison and HowardFirst linked Feb 2008 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 0.62× · 95% wipeout 1.68×
- Pryor CashmanFirst linked Dec 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 229 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 1.25× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Sherman & Howard L.L.C.First linked Feb 2008 · Text search only · 105 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.48×
- Saul EwingFirst linked Dec 2007 · Text search only · 100 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.22× · Went dark 1.01× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stevens & Lee | Feb 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 127 | 1.08 | 0.74 | 0.59 |
| Hale Lane Peek Dennison and Howard | Feb 2008 | Named in a filing | 14 | 0.64 | 0.62 | 1.68 |
| Pryor Cashman | Dec 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 229 | 1.28 | 1.25 | 1.28 |
| Sherman & Howard L.L.C. | Feb 2008 | Text search only | 105 | 1.02 | 0.99 | 1.48 |
| Saul Ewing | Dec 2007 | Text search only | 100 | 1.22 | 1.01 | 1.14 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| William W. UchimotoStevens & Lee | Jul 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 1.14 | 1.68 | 1.16 |