Qimonda AG
CIK 1369377Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 1
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Sep 2007 · Named in a filing · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Jul 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 742 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jul 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Clifford Chance US LLPFirst linked Jul 2006 · Text search only · 260 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.41× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Dewey BallantineFirst linked Jul 2006 · Text search only · 228 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.03× · Went dark 0.29× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Jul 2006 · Text search only · 1,688 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- McGuireWoods LLPFirst linked Jul 2006 · Text search only · 358 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Munger Tolles & OlsonFirst linked Jul 2006 · Text search only · 80 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.57× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Sep 2007 | Named in a filing | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.78 |
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Jul 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 742 | 1.30 | 0.12 | 0.72 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jul 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
| Clifford Chance US LLP | Jul 2006 | Text search only | 260 | 0.92 | 0.41 | 0.93 |
| Dewey Ballantine | Jul 2006 | Text search only | 228 | 2.03 | 0.29 | 0.84 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Jul 2006 | Text search only | 1,688 | 0.97 | 0.17 | 0.86 |
| McGuireWoods LLP | Jul 2006 | Text search only | 358 | 0.97 | 0.85 | 1.10 |
| Munger Tolles & Olson | Jul 2006 | Text search only | 80 | 1.57 | 0.00 | 0.92 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward A. GreenbergCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Jul 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |