China Wood, Inc. TBJK (last ticker on record)
CIK 1368960Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- ANSLOW & JACLIN, LLPFirst linked Oct 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 375 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 1.40× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- The Sourlis Law FirmFirst linked Feb 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 1.52× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Lowenstein SandlerFirst linked Feb 2011 · Text search only · 297 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.70× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANSLOW & JACLIN, LLP | Oct 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 375 | 1.17 | 1.40 | 0.93 |
| The Sourlis Law Firm | Feb 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 47 | 1.24 | 1.52 | 1.00 |
| Lowenstein Sandler | Feb 2011 | Text search only | 297 | 1.12 | 0.70 | 1.42 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Eric M. SteinANSLOW & JACLIN, LLPFirst linked Oct 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 60 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.85× · 95% wipeout 1.45×
- Richard I. AnslowEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Oct 2010 · Named in a filing · 153 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Virginia K. SourlisThe Sourlis Law FirmFirst linked Nov 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.86× · Went dark 1.57× · 95% wipeout 1.40×
- Steven M. SkolnickLowenstein SandlerFirst linked Oct 2010 · Text search only · 69 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.18× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Joseph M. PatricolaThe Sourlis Law FirmFirst linked Feb 2009 · Text search only · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.45× · Went dark 3.29× · 95% wipeout 2.13×
- Randall V. BrumbaughFirst linked Jul 2006 · Text search only · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.29× · Went dark 0.90× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eric M. SteinANSLOW & JACLIN, LLP | Oct 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 60 | 1.01 | 1.85 | 1.45 |
| Richard I. AnslowEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Oct 2010 | Named in a filing | 153 | 1.23 | 1.12 | 0.95 |
| Virginia K. SourlisThe Sourlis Law Firm | Nov 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 37 | 1.86 | 1.57 | 1.40 |
| Steven M. SkolnickLowenstein Sandler | Oct 2010 | Text search only | 69 | 1.23 | 1.18 | 1.36 |
| Joseph M. PatricolaThe Sourlis Law Firm | Feb 2009 | Text search only | 17 | 1.45 | 3.29 | 2.13 |
| Randall V. Brumbaugh | Jul 2006 | Text search only | 33 | 0.29 | 0.90 | 0.73 |