Burlington Coat Factory Investments Holdings, Inc.
CIK 1368775Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 15
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Oct 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PCFirst linked Oct 2006 · Text search only · 149 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 1.18× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Blank RomeFirst linked Oct 2006 · Text search only · 348 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.79× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Oct 2006 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Day Berry & HowardFirst linked Oct 2006 · Text search only · 61 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- Foley & LardnerFirst linked Oct 2006 · Text search only · 498 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Haynes and BooneFirst linked Oct 2006 · Text search only · 353 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Hughes Hubbard & ReedFirst linked Oct 2006 · Text search only · 121 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Oct 2006 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Phillips Nizer LLPFirst linked Oct 2006 · Text search only · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 1.85× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Pitney HardinFirst linked Oct 2006 · Text search only · 49 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Oct 2006 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Shook Hardy & BaconFirst linked Oct 2006 · Text search only · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.76×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Oct 2006 · Text search only · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Squire Sanders (US)First linked Oct 2006 · Text search only · 199 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.98× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | Oct 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC | Oct 2006 | Text search only | 149 | 0.72 | 1.18 | 1.15 |
| Blank Rome | Oct 2006 | Text search only | 348 | 1.04 | 0.79 | 1.36 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Oct 2006 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| Day Berry & Howard | Oct 2006 | Text search only | 61 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 0.81 |
| Foley & Lardner | Oct 2006 | Text search only | 498 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 1.02 |
| Haynes and Boone | Oct 2006 | Text search only | 353 | 1.03 | 0.56 | 0.84 |
| Hughes Hubbard & Reed | Oct 2006 | Text search only | 121 | 1.17 | 0.21 | 1.26 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Oct 2006 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Phillips Nizer LLP | Oct 2006 | Text search only | 45 | 0.98 | 1.85 | 0.83 |
| Pitney Hardin | Oct 2006 | Text search only | 49 | 1.46 | 0.38 | 1.07 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Oct 2006 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Shook Hardy & Bacon | Oct 2006 | Text search only | 35 | 1.07 | 0.00 | 1.76 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Oct 2006 | Text search only | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Squire Sanders (US) | Oct 2006 | Text search only | 199 | 0.88 | 0.98 | 1.13 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Joshua N. KorffKirkland & EllisFirst linked Oct 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 107 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.43×
- Christopher A. KitchenKirkland & EllisFirst linked Aug 2011 · Text search only · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- John A. TripodoroCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Oct 2006 · Text search only · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.29×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joshua N. KorffKirkland & Ellis | Oct 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 107 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 1.43 |
| Christopher A. KitchenKirkland & Ellis | Aug 2011 | Text search only | 25 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 0.81 |
| John A. TripodoroCahill Gordon & Reindel | Oct 2006 | Text search only | 36 | 0.68 | 0.00 | 0.29 |