AeroVironment Inc AVAV (last ticker on record)
CIK 1368622Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Jun 2026
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- K&L GatesFirst linked Sep 2022 · Named in a filing · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Sep 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- O Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Sep 2006 · Text search only · 589 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.25× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K&L Gates | Sep 2022 | Named in a filing | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.20 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Sep 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.08 |
| O Melveny & Myers LLP | Sep 2006 | Text search only | 589 | 1.07 | 0.25 | 1.06 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Drew CapurroLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2025 · Named in SEC correspondence · 41 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Charles K. RuckLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jan 2025 · Named in SEC correspondence · 74 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Leah R. SauterLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jan 2025 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.97× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Craig M. GarnerLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Sep 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.37× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Michael E. SullivanLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Sep 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.56× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Caitlin R. TompkinsGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Jan 2025 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark — · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drew CapurroLatham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2025 | Named in SEC correspondence | 41 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 1.26 |
| Charles K. RuckLatham & Watkins LLP | Jan 2025 | Named in SEC correspondence | 74 | 1.30 | 0.35 | 0.66 |
| Leah R. SauterLatham & Watkins LLP | Jan 2025 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 3.97 | 0.00 | 0.88 |
| Craig M. GarnerLatham & Watkins LLP | Sep 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 20 | 0.37 | 0.00 | 1.04 |
| Michael E. SullivanLatham & Watkins LLP | Sep 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 43 | 0.56 | 0.00 | 0.77 |
| Caitlin R. TompkinsGoodwin Procter | Jan 2025 | Text search only | 6 | 0.00 | — | 0.00 |