REMARK HOLDINGS, INC. MARK (last ticker on record)
CIK 1368365Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- 95% wipeout
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Mar 2020
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Jan 2018 to Sep 2024
- Law firms
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Fox Rothschild LLPFirst linked Oct 2024 · Named in SEC correspondence · 149 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 1.38× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Blank RomeFirst linked Jun 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 348 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.79× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Olshan Frome Wolosky LLPFirst linked Jul 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.38× · Went dark 0.86× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Mar 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Mar 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Wyrick Robbins Yates & Ponton LLPFirst linked Mar 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 113 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.68× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Holland & KnightFirst linked Jul 2014 · Text search only · 413 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- Morris, Manning & Martin, LLPFirst linked Apr 2012 · Text search only · 105 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.58× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Adorno & Yoss, P.A.First linked Mar 2007 · Text search only · 49 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.62× · Went dark 1.01× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- White & CaseFirst linked Mar 2007 · Text search only · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fox Rothschild LLP | Oct 2024 | Named in SEC correspondence | 149 | 0.92 | 1.38 | 0.90 |
| Blank Rome | Jun 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 348 | 1.04 | 0.79 | 1.36 |
| Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP | Jul 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 390 | 1.38 | 0.86 | 1.22 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Mar 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Mar 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Wyrick Robbins Yates & Ponton LLP | Mar 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 113 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 1.07 |
| Holland & Knight | Jul 2014 | Text search only | 413 | 1.17 | 0.82 | 1.19 |
| Morris, Manning & Martin, LLP | Apr 2012 | Text search only | 105 | 0.58 | 0.34 | 0.86 |
| Adorno & Yoss, P.A. | Mar 2007 | Text search only | 49 | 1.62 | 1.01 | 1.22 |
| White & Case | Mar 2007 | Text search only | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Laura M. HolmFox Rothschild LLPFirst linked Oct 2024 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.74×
- Hank GracinGracin & Marlow, LLPFirst linked Jun 2023 · Named in a filing · 77 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 2.28× · 95% wipeout 1.53×
- Leslie MarlowBlank RomeFirst linked Jun 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 71 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.58× · Went dark 2.60× · 95% wipeout 1.43×
- Patrick J. EganGracin & Marlow, LLPFirst linked Jun 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.40× · Went dark 1.84× · 95% wipeout 1.89×
- Robert H. FriedmanOlshan Frome Wolosky LLPFirst linked Jul 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.78× · Went dark 2.03× · 95% wipeout 2.11×
- Donald R. ReynoldsWyrick Robbins Yates & Ponton LLPFirst linked Sep 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 41 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.87× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Gerald L. BaxterGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Feb 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.89×
- Lee EdwardsShearman & SterlingFirst linked Mar 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.22× · Went dark 0.65× · 95% wipeout 2.33×
- Paul StreckerShearman & SterlingFirst linked Mar 2007 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.40×
- Martin A. TraberFoley & LardnerFirst linked Apr 2012 · Text search only · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.50× · Went dark 2.27× · 95% wipeout 1.55×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura M. HolmFox Rothschild LLP | Oct 2024 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 0.82 | 0.00 | 0.74 |
| Hank GracinGracin & Marlow, LLP | Jun 2023 | Named in a filing | 77 | 0.66 | 2.28 | 1.53 |
| Leslie MarlowBlank Rome | Jun 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 71 | 0.58 | 2.60 | 1.43 |
| Patrick J. EganGracin & Marlow, LLP | Jun 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 43 | 0.40 | 1.84 | 1.89 |
| Robert H. FriedmanOlshan Frome Wolosky LLP | Jul 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 1.78 | 2.03 | 2.11 |
| Donald R. ReynoldsWyrick Robbins Yates & Ponton LLP | Sep 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 41 | 0.87 | 0.38 | 0.98 |
| Gerald L. BaxterGreenberg Traurig | Feb 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.89 |
| Lee EdwardsShearman & Sterling | Mar 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 2.22 | 0.65 | 2.33 |
| Paul StreckerShearman & Sterling | Mar 2007 | Named in a filing | 15 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.40 |
| Martin A. TraberFoley & Lardner | Apr 2012 | Text search only | 21 | 1.50 | 2.27 | 1.55 |