Oriental Dragon Corp
CIK 1368196Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jun 2014
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Conyers Dill & PearmanFirst linked Jul 2010 · Named in a filing · 531 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- AllBright Law OfficesFirst linked Apr 2010 · Named in a filing · 106 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 1.49× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- ANSLOW & JACLIN, LLPFirst linked Oct 2009 · Named in a filing · 375 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 1.40× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Gusrae Kaplan & BrunoFirst linked Jul 2006 · Named in a filing · 76 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.60× · Went dark 1.31× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conyers Dill & Pearman | Jul 2010 | Named in a filing | 531 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 1.16 |
| AllBright Law Offices | Apr 2010 | Named in a filing | 106 | 0.72 | 1.49 | 1.16 |
| ANSLOW & JACLIN, LLP | Oct 2009 | Named in a filing | 375 | 1.17 | 1.40 | 0.93 |
| Gusrae Kaplan & Bruno | Jul 2006 | Named in a filing | 76 | 0.60 | 1.31 | 0.89 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kristina L. TraugerANSLOW & JACLIN, LLPFirst linked Oct 2009 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 2.40× · 95% wipeout 0.51×
- Richard I. AnslowEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Oct 2009 · Named in a filing · 153 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Lawrence G. NusbaumGusrae Kaplan & BrunoFirst linked Jul 2006 · Named in a filing · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 1.57× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
- Steve ZhuAllBright Law OfficesFirst linked Jul 2010 · Text search only · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.62× · Went dark 3.66× · 95% wipeout 1.85×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kristina L. TraugerANSLOW & JACLIN, LLP | Oct 2009 | Named in a filing | 15 | 0.00 | 2.40 | 0.51 |
| Richard I. AnslowEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Oct 2009 | Named in a filing | 153 | 1.23 | 1.12 | 0.95 |
| Lawrence G. NusbaumGusrae Kaplan & Bruno | Jul 2006 | Named in a filing | 46 | 0.99 | 1.57 | 0.70 |
| Steve ZhuAllBright Law Offices | Jul 2010 | Text search only | 15 | 0.62 | 3.66 | 1.85 |