ATHERSYS, INC / NEW ATHX (last ticker on record)
CIK 1368148Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- 95% wipeout
- Restructuring
- Bankruptcy
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 4
- Newest began Jan 2024
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Dec 2009 to Mar 2024
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Blank RomeFirst linked Jul 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 348 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.79× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Thompson Hine LLPFirst linked Jul 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 208 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.64× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Jan 2015 · Named in a filing · 963 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Oct 2012 · Named in a filing · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Jones DayFirst linked Jul 2007 · Text search only · 686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Luce Forward Hamilton & ScrippsFirst linked Jul 2007 · Text search only · 80 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.85× · Went dark 1.20× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Jul 2007 · Text search only · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blank Rome | Jul 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 348 | 1.04 | 0.79 | 1.36 |
| Thompson Hine LLP | Jul 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 208 | 0.95 | 0.64 | 1.09 |
| Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Jan 2015 | Named in a filing | 963 | 0.96 | 1.12 | 1.21 |
| Goodwin Procter | Oct 2012 | Named in a filing | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Jones Day | Jul 2007 | Text search only | 686 | 1.25 | 0.54 | 1.12 |
| Luce Forward Hamilton & Scripps | Jul 2007 | Text search only | 80 | 0.85 | 1.20 | 0.90 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Jul 2007 | Text search only | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Faith L. CharlesThompson Hine LLPFirst linked Jul 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.22× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Leslie MarlowBlank RomeFirst linked Jul 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 71 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.58× · Went dark 2.60× · 95% wipeout 1.43×
- Naveen PogulaThompson Hine LLPFirst linked Jul 2023 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Patrick J. EganGracin & Marlow, LLPFirst linked Jul 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.40× · Went dark 1.84× · 95% wipeout 1.89×
- Michael D. MalineGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Oct 2012 · Named in a filing · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Michael J. SoleckiCravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Oct 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 48 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.84×
- Christopher M. KellyJones DayFirst linked Jul 2007 · Named in a filing · 56 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- Michael J. Solecki Jones DayCravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Jan 2010 · Text search only · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.62× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Faith L. CharlesThompson Hine LLP | Jul 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 33 | 1.22 | 0.00 | 0.88 |
| Leslie MarlowBlank Rome | Jul 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 71 | 0.58 | 2.60 | 1.43 |
| Naveen PogulaThompson Hine LLP | Jul 2023 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.28 |
| Patrick J. EganGracin & Marlow, LLP | Jul 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 43 | 0.40 | 1.84 | 1.89 |
| Michael D. MalineGoodwin Procter | Oct 2012 | Named in a filing | 45 | 0.73 | 0.00 | 1.36 |
| Michael J. SoleckiCravath Swaine & Moore | Oct 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 48 | 1.08 | 0.00 | 1.84 |
| Christopher M. KellyJones Day | Jul 2007 | Named in a filing | 56 | 1.20 | 0.00 | 0.64 |
| Michael J. Solecki Jones DayCravath Swaine & Moore | Jan 2010 | Text search only | 33 | 0.62 | 0.00 | 0.88 |