DAKOTA PLAINS HOLDINGS, INC. DAKP (last ticker on record)
CIK 1367311Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Bankruptcy
- Restructuring
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 4
- Newest began Jun 2018
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Faegre Baker DanielsFirst linked Apr 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 145 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Baker & DanielsFirst linked Apr 2012 · Text search only · 129 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Faegre Baker Daniels | Apr 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 145 | 1.06 | 0.34 | 1.16 |
| Baker & Daniels | Apr 2012 | Text search only | 129 | 1.11 | 0.45 | 1.22 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- W. Morgan BurnsFaegre & BensonFirst linked Sep 2012 · Named in a filing · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Joshua L. ColburnFaegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLPFirst linked Apr 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.45× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Morgan BurnsFaegre Baker DanielsFirst linked Sep 2013 · Text search only · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.38× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.43×
- Bradley C. BurninghamFirst linked Aug 2008 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 2.28× · 95% wipeout 1.99×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W. Morgan BurnsFaegre & Benson | Sep 2012 | Named in a filing | 27 | 1.11 | 0.00 | 1.28 |
| Joshua L. ColburnFaegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP | Apr 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 1.45 | 0.00 | 0.85 |
| Morgan BurnsFaegre Baker Daniels | Sep 2013 | Text search only | 13 | 2.38 | 0.00 | 2.43 |
| Bradley C. Burningham | Aug 2008 | Text search only | 8 | 1.03 | 2.28 | 1.99 |