Bank of the Carolinas CORP BCAR (last ticker on record)
CIK 1365997Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Aug 2011
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Jul 2006 to Jan 2015
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kutak RockFirst linked Jun 2015 · Named in a filing · 123 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 1.56× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- Wyrick Robbins Yates & Ponton LLPFirst linked Aug 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 113 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.68× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Gaeta & Eveson, P.A.First linked Jun 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.94× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Ward and Smith, P.A.First linked Sep 2006 · Named in a filing · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.54× · Went dark 1.37× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Hughes Hubbard & ReedFirst linked Jun 2009 · Text search only · 121 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kutak Rock | Jun 2015 | Named in a filing | 123 | 0.93 | 1.56 | 0.64 |
| Wyrick Robbins Yates & Ponton LLP | Aug 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 113 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 1.07 |
| Gaeta & Eveson, P.A. | Jun 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 1.94 | 0.72 | 1.26 |
| Ward and Smith, P.A. | Sep 2006 | Named in a filing | 29 | 0.54 | 1.37 | 1.16 |
| Hughes Hubbard & Reed | Jun 2009 | Text search only | 121 | 1.17 | 0.21 | 1.26 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jonathan A. GreeneWyrick Robbins Yates & Ponton LLPFirst linked Aug 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.58× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.32×
- William R. Lathan Jr.Ward and Smith, P.A.First linked Sep 2006 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.68×
- Todd H. EvesonWyrick Robbins Yates & Ponton LLPFirst linked Jul 2014 · Text search only · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.52× · Went dark 0.69× · 95% wipeout 0.52×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jonathan A. GreeneWyrick Robbins Yates & Ponton LLP | Aug 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 0.58 | 0.00 | 0.32 |
| William R. Lathan Jr.Ward and Smith, P.A. | Sep 2006 | Named in a filing | 12 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.68 |
| Todd H. EvesonWyrick Robbins Yates & Ponton LLP | Jul 2014 | Text search only | 20 | 0.52 | 0.69 | 0.52 |