AMYRIS, INC. AMRS (last ticker on record)
CIK 1365916Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Bankruptcy
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 5
- Newest began Aug 2023
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Dec 2015 to Aug 2023
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Fenwick & West LLPFirst linked Apr 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 443 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Apr 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Mar 2012 · Text search only · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Jones DayFirst linked Aug 2010 · Text search only · 686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Jun 2010 · Text search only · 500 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Apr 2010 · Text search only · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fenwick & West LLP | Apr 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 443 | 0.95 | 0.21 | 1.23 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Apr 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
| Goodwin Procter | Mar 2012 | Text search only | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Jones Day | Aug 2010 | Text search only | 686 | 1.25 | 0.54 | 1.12 |
| Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Jun 2010 | Text search only | 500 | 1.12 | 0.61 | 1.08 |
| Morgan Lewis | Apr 2010 | Text search only | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.02 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ryan MittenessFenwick & West LLPFirst linked Dec 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Amanda RoseFenwick & West LLPFirst linked Jan 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.87× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- David K. MichaelsFenwick & West LLPFirst linked May 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 64 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.67×
- Dan WinnikeFenwick & West LLPFirst linked Mar 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.78× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Allison B. SpinnerWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Apr 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.99×
- Daniel J. WinnikeFenwick & West LLPFirst linked Apr 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.48× · Went dark 2.80× · 95% wipeout 1.63×
- Gordon K. DavidsonFenwick & West LLPFirst linked Apr 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 67 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Jeffrey D. SaperWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Apr 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 102 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.83× · 95% wipeout 1.51×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ryan MittenessFenwick & West LLP | Dec 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 22 | 0.84 | 0.00 | 0.91 |
| Amanda RoseFenwick & West LLP | Jan 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 24 | 1.87 | 0.00 | 1.27 |
| David K. MichaelsFenwick & West LLP | May 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 64 | 1.53 | 0.00 | 0.67 |
| Dan WinnikeFenwick & West LLP | Mar 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 1.78 | 0.00 | 1.36 |
| Allison B. SpinnerWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Apr 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 32 | 1.30 | 0.00 | 1.99 |
| Daniel J. WinnikeFenwick & West LLP | Apr 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 25 | 0.48 | 2.80 | 1.63 |
| Gordon K. DavidsonFenwick & West LLP | Apr 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 67 | 1.09 | 0.00 | 1.15 |
| Jeffrey D. SaperWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Apr 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 102 | 1.24 | 0.83 | 1.51 |