Central GoldTrust
CIK 1364728Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Jun 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Bennett JonesFirst linked Jun 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 121 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
- Dentons CanadaFirst linked Jun 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 49 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.80× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.45×
- Cassels Brock & BlackwellFirst linked Mar 2007 · Named in a filing · 102 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.79× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Dorsey & Whitney LLPFirst linked Mar 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 630 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.73× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Fraser Milner CasgrainFirst linked Mar 2007 · Named in a filing · 66 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Jun 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 826 | 1.02 | 0.18 | 0.83 |
| Bennett Jones | Jun 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 121 | 1.27 | 0.16 | 1.29 |
| Dentons Canada | Jun 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 49 | 0.80 | 0.00 | 1.45 |
| Cassels Brock & Blackwell | Mar 2007 | Named in a filing | 102 | 0.99 | 0.79 | 0.77 |
| Dorsey & Whitney LLP | Mar 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 630 | 0.83 | 0.73 | 1.16 |
| Fraser Milner Casgrain | Mar 2007 | Named in a filing | 66 | 0.98 | 0.18 | 0.72 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Christopher J. BarryDorsey & Whitney LLPFirst linked Jun 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.69× · 95% wipeout 2.10×
- Christopher J. CummingsPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked May 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 60 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 0.74×
- Edwin S. MaynardPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked May 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.23× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christopher J. BarryDorsey & Whitney LLP | Jun 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 0.00 | 0.69 | 2.10 |
| Christopher J. CummingsPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | May 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 60 | 1.20 | 0.38 | 0.74 |
| Edwin S. MaynardPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | May 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 26 | 0.23 | 0.00 | 1.07 |