METALS USA HOLDINGS CORP. MUSA (last ticker on record)
CIK 1362491Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Apr 2010
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Hogan Lovells US LLPFirst linked May 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Akin GumpFirst linked Sep 2007 · Named in a filing · 582 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked May 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked May 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Nov 2009 · Text search only · 1,185 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Sep 2007 · Text search only · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hogan Lovells US LLP | May 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 487 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.85 |
| Akin Gump | Sep 2007 | Named in a filing | 582 | 1.24 | 0.52 | 1.18 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | May 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.82 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | May 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 889 | 1.29 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| DLA Piper | Nov 2009 | Text search only | 1,185 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.17 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Sep 2007 | Text search only | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Alan L. DyeHogan & HartsonFirst linked Mar 2012 · Named in a filing · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.56× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- John B. BeckmanHogan Lovells US LLPFirst linked May 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.57× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Rosa A. TestaniAkin GumpFirst linked Sep 2007 · Named in a filing · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.56×
- Andrew J. NussbaumWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked May 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alan L. DyeHogan & Hartson | Mar 2012 | Named in a filing | 17 | 0.56 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| John B. BeckmanHogan Lovells US LLP | May 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 36 | 0.57 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Rosa A. TestaniAkin Gump | Sep 2007 | Named in a filing | 29 | 0.96 | 0.00 | 0.56 |
| Andrew J. NussbaumWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | May 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 29 | 0.78 | 0.00 | 1.24 |