ICF International, Inc. ICFI (last ticker on record)
CIK 1362004Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLPFirst linked Aug 2015 · Named in a filing · 97 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.43× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Squire Sanders (US)First linked May 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 199 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.98× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Jones WalkerFirst linked Jul 2006 · Text search only · 161 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 0.23× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Jun 2006 · Text search only · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Davis PolkFirst linked May 2006 · Text search only · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Dickstein ShapiroFirst linked May 2006 · Text search only · 41 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked May 2006 · Text search only · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Jenner & BlockFirst linked May 2006 · Text search only · 122 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.78× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP | Aug 2015 | Named in a filing | 97 | 0.43 | 0.00 | 0.73 |
| Squire Sanders (US) | May 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 199 | 0.88 | 0.98 | 1.13 |
| Jones Walker | Jul 2006 | Text search only | 161 | 1.34 | 0.23 | 0.94 |
| Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Jun 2006 | Text search only | 826 | 1.02 | 0.18 | 0.83 |
| Davis Polk | May 2006 | Text search only | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Dickstein Shapiro | May 2006 | Text search only | 41 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 1.11 |
| Greenberg Traurig | May 2006 | Text search only | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| Jenner & Block | May 2006 | Text search only | 122 | 1.12 | 0.78 | 0.94 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- James J. MaiwurmSquire Sanders (US)First linked May 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Jeffrey R. HouleGreenberg TraurigFirst linked May 2006 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| James J. MaiwurmSquire Sanders (US) | May 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 1.19 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Jeffrey R. HouleGreenberg Traurig | May 2006 | Text search only | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |