ASIA TIME CORP TYM (last ticker on record)
CIK 1361916Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Mar 2009
- Largest fall in its shares
- 95%
- May 2008 to Mar 2009
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- K&L GatesFirst linked Feb 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Feldman WeinsteinFirst linked May 2006 · Named in a filing · 278 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 1.17× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Paul HastingsFirst linked Jan 2008 · Text search only · 768 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Preston Gates & EllisFirst linked Feb 2007 · Text search only · 159 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 1.62× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K&L Gates | Feb 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.18 |
| Feldman Weinstein | May 2006 | Named in a filing | 278 | 0.92 | 1.17 | 1.20 |
| Paul Hastings | Jan 2008 | Text search only | 768 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 1.09 |
| Preston Gates & Ellis | Feb 2007 | Text search only | 159 | 1.36 | 1.62 | 1.44 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Anh Q. TranK&L GatesFirst linked Feb 2007 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.54× · Went dark 1.32× · 95% wipeout 1.78×
- Thomas J. PolettiK&L GatesFirst linked Feb 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 71 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 1.24× · 95% wipeout 1.75×
- David N. FeldmanFeldman WeinsteinFirst linked May 2006 · Named in a filing · 145 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.47× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Anh TranProskauer RoseFirst linked Feb 2008 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.52× · Went dark 3.23× · 95% wipeout 2.39×
- Randall S. GouldingFirst linked Feb 2007 · Text search only · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.12× · Went dark 1.41× · 95% wipeout 2.33×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anh Q. TranK&L Gates | Feb 2007 | Named in a filing | 12 | 2.54 | 1.32 | 1.78 |
| Thomas J. PolettiK&L Gates | Feb 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 71 | 1.51 | 1.24 | 1.75 |
| David N. FeldmanFeldman Weinstein | May 2006 | Named in a filing | 145 | 0.47 | 0.48 | 1.16 |
| Anh TranProskauer Rose | Feb 2008 | Text search only | 6 | 2.52 | 3.23 | 2.39 |
| Randall S. Goulding | Feb 2007 | Text search only | 21 | 3.12 | 1.41 | 2.33 |