MAVENIR SYSTEMS INC MVNR (last ticker on record)
CIK 1361470Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Andrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Dec 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 398 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Apr 2015 · Text search only · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- Fenwick & West LLPFirst linked Jul 2014 · Text search only · 443 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- McGuireWoods LLPFirst linked Dec 2012 · Text search only · 358 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Perkins CoieFirst linked Dec 2012 · Text search only · 511 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Dec 2012 · Text search only · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrews Kurth LLP | Dec 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 398 | 1.27 | 0.35 | 1.26 |
| Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Apr 2015 | Text search only | 826 | 1.02 | 0.18 | 0.81 |
| Fenwick & West LLP | Jul 2014 | Text search only | 443 | 0.95 | 0.21 | 1.23 |
| McGuireWoods LLP | Dec 2012 | Text search only | 358 | 0.97 | 0.85 | 1.10 |
| Perkins Coie | Dec 2012 | Text search only | 511 | 0.93 | 0.27 | 0.98 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Dec 2012 | Text search only | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.66 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Richard D. Truesdell Jr.Davis PolkFirst linked Dec 2012 · Named in a filing · 149 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Ted GilmanAndrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Dec 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.73× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- Adam M. GivertzPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Apr 2015 · Text search only · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.63×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard D. Truesdell Jr.Davis Polk | Dec 2012 | Named in a filing | 149 | 0.91 | 0.00 | 1.03 |
| Ted GilmanAndrews Kurth LLP | Dec 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 1.73 | 0.00 | 0.64 |
| Adam M. GivertzPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Apr 2015 | Text search only | 43 | 0.84 | 0.00 | 0.63 |