Affinion Group, Inc.
CIK 1361394Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 13
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ice MillerFirst linked Mar 2011 · Named in a filing · 112 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Baker & DanielsFirst linked Jul 2009 · Named in a filing · 129 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Akin GumpFirst linked May 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 582 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Holland & HartFirst linked May 2006 · Named in a filing · 240 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 0.92× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Troutman Sanders LLPFirst linked May 2006 · Named in a filing · 335 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Arent FoxFirst linked Mar 2011 · Text search only · 90 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.94× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Mar 2011 · Text search only · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- McGuireWoods LLPFirst linked Jul 2009 · Text search only · 358 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked May 2006 · Text search only · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- O Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked May 2006 · Text search only · 589 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.25× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked May 2006 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked May 2006 · Text search only · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked May 2006 · Text search only · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ice Miller | Mar 2011 | Named in a filing | 112 | 1.19 | 0.21 | 0.93 |
| Baker & Daniels | Jul 2009 | Named in a filing | 129 | 1.11 | 0.45 | 1.22 |
| Akin Gump | May 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 582 | 1.24 | 0.52 | 1.25 |
| Holland & Hart | May 2006 | Named in a filing | 240 | 0.82 | 0.92 | 0.86 |
| Troutman Sanders LLP | May 2006 | Named in a filing | 335 | 1.15 | 0.61 | 1.16 |
| Arent Fox | Mar 2011 | Text search only | 90 | 0.94 | 0.94 | 0.91 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Mar 2011 | Text search only | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
| McGuireWoods LLP | Jul 2009 | Text search only | 358 | 0.97 | 0.85 | 1.11 |
| Baker & McKenzie | May 2006 | Text search only | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
| O Melveny & Myers LLP | May 2006 | Text search only | 589 | 1.07 | 0.25 | 1.07 |
| Shearman & Sterling | May 2006 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | May 2006 | Text search only | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | May 2006 | Text search only | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Rosa A. TestaniAkin GumpFirst linked May 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.60×
- Patricia MoranSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked May 2006 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
- Robert Evans IIIShearman & SterlingFirst linked May 2006 · Text search only · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rosa A. TestaniAkin Gump | May 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 29 | 0.96 | 0.00 | 0.60 |
| Patricia MoranSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | May 2006 | Text search only | 8 | 1.46 | 0.00 | 1.33 |
| Robert Evans IIIShearman & Sterling | May 2006 | Text search only | 25 | 0.91 | 0.00 | 1.32 |