Pendrell Corp PCOA (last ticker on record)
CIK 1359555Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Bankruptcy
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began May 2009
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- DLA PiperFirst linked Nov 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked Feb 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 825 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPFirst linked May 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 130 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Holme Roberts & Owen LLPFirst linked May 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 99 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.90× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Debevoise & PlimptonFirst linked May 2006 · Text search only · 424 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked May 2006 · Text search only · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Munger Tolles & OlsonFirst linked May 2006 · Text search only · 80 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.57× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Perkins CoieFirst linked May 2006 · Text search only · 511 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked May 2006 · Text search only · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DLA Piper | Nov 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Morrison & Foerster | Feb 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 825 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.15 |
| Davis Wright Tremaine LLP | May 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 130 | 0.97 | 0.59 | 1.27 |
| Holme Roberts & Owen LLP | May 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 99 | 1.31 | 0.90 | 1.28 |
| Debevoise & Plimpton | May 2006 | Text search only | 424 | 1.10 | 0.14 | 1.04 |
| HALE AND DORR | May 2006 | Text search only | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| Munger Tolles & Olson | May 2006 | Text search only | 80 | 1.57 | 0.00 | 0.87 |
| Perkins Coie | May 2006 | Text search only | 511 | 0.93 | 0.27 | 0.98 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | May 2006 | Text search only | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- John M. RaffertyMorrison & FoersterFirst linked Mar 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.25× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- W. Michael HutchingsDLA PiperFirst linked Dec 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.59× · Went dark 0.96× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Jaclyn LiuMorrison & FoersterFirst linked Feb 2010 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.16× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Robert S. TownsendMorrison & FoersterFirst linked Feb 2010 · Named in a filing · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.95× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- David C. BacaDavis Wright Tremaine LLPFirst linked May 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 2.58× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Garth B. JensenHolme Roberts & Owen LLPFirst linked May 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 1.51× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Gregory V. GoodingDebevoise & PlimptonFirst linked May 2006 · Text search only · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.65×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John M. RaffertyMorrison & Foerster | Mar 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 2.25 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| W. Michael HutchingsDLA Piper | Dec 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 1.59 | 0.96 | 0.00 |
| Jaclyn LiuMorrison & Foerster | Feb 2010 | Named in a filing | 15 | 2.16 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Robert S. TownsendMorrison & Foerster | Feb 2010 | Named in a filing | 27 | 1.05 | 0.95 | 0.79 |
| David C. BacaDavis Wright Tremaine LLP | May 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 0.00 | 2.58 | 0.89 |
| Garth B. JensenHolme Roberts & Owen LLP | May 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 22 | 1.12 | 1.51 | 1.36 |
| Gregory V. GoodingDebevoise & Plimpton | May 2006 | Text search only | 13 | 1.40 | 0.00 | 1.65 |