Intcomex, Inc.
CIK 1359425Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Carlton FieldsFirst linked Dec 2010 · Named in a filing · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked May 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Lewis and RocaFirst linked Aug 2006 · Text search only · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 1.60× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked May 2006 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Neal Gerber & EisenbergFirst linked May 2006 · Text search only · 56 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.05×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked May 2006 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carlton Fields | Dec 2010 | Named in a filing | 47 | 1.34 | 0.44 | 1.13 |
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | May 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 741 | 1.31 | 0.12 | 0.76 |
| Lewis and Roca | Aug 2006 | Text search only | 46 | 1.25 | 1.60 | 1.33 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | May 2006 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| Neal Gerber & Eisenberg | May 2006 | Text search only | 56 | 0.86 | 0.00 | 1.05 |
| Shearman & Sterling | May 2006 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Dennis J. OlleADORNO & ZEDERFirst linked Jan 2011 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.70× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Jeffrey D. KarpfCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Jul 2007 · Named in a filing · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.58× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Juan G. GiraldezCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Dec 2010 · Text search only · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.35× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.60×
- Jeffrey S. LewisCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked May 2006 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.79× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dennis J. OlleADORNO & ZEDER | Jan 2011 | Named in a filing | 7 | 2.70 | 1.12 | 0.00 |
| Jeffrey D. KarpfCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Jul 2007 | Named in a filing | 35 | 2.58 | 0.00 | 1.42 |
| Juan G. GiraldezCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Dec 2010 | Text search only | 15 | 2.35 | 0.00 | 0.60 |
| Jeffrey S. LewisCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | May 2006 | Text search only | 10 | 2.79 | 0.00 | 0.93 |