Everyday Health, Inc. EVDY (last ticker on record)
CIK 1358483Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 13
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Harris BeachFirst linked Dec 2016 · Named in a filing · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Jan 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jan 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Fox Rothschild LLPFirst linked Mar 2014 · Text search only · 149 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 1.38× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Patton BoggsFirst linked Nov 2013 · Text search only · 186 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Perkins CoieFirst linked Nov 2013 · Text search only · 511 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Davis & GilbertFirst linked Jan 2010 · Text search only · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.52× · Went dark 0.58× · 95% wipeout 1.52×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Jan 2010 · Text search only · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Dechert LLPFirst linked Jan 2010 · Text search only · 434 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.41× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Loeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Jan 2010 · Text search only · 838 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Pillsbury WinthropFirst linked Jan 2010 · Text search only · 516 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Seyfarth ShawFirst linked Jan 2010 · Text search only · 102 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.57× · Went dark 1.38× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Jan 2010 · Text search only · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harris Beach | Dec 2016 | Named in a filing | 38 | 1.03 | 0.00 | 1.24 |
| Cooley LLP | Jan 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Jan 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Fox Rothschild LLP | Mar 2014 | Text search only | 149 | 0.92 | 1.38 | 0.90 |
| Patton Boggs | Nov 2013 | Text search only | 186 | 0.92 | 0.76 | 1.35 |
| Perkins Coie | Nov 2013 | Text search only | 511 | 0.93 | 0.27 | 0.98 |
| Davis & Gilbert | Jan 2010 | Text search only | 20 | 1.52 | 0.58 | 1.52 |
| Davis Polk | Jan 2010 | Text search only | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Dechert LLP | Jan 2010 | Text search only | 434 | 0.84 | 0.41 | 0.96 |
| Loeb & Loeb LLP | Jan 2010 | Text search only | 838 | 0.92 | 0.99 | 1.10 |
| Pillsbury Winthrop | Jan 2010 | Text search only | 516 | 1.13 | 0.82 | 1.27 |
| Seyfarth Shaw | Jan 2010 | Text search only | 102 | 1.57 | 1.38 | 1.25 |
| Sidley Austin | Jan 2010 | Text search only | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Alison HaggertyCooley LLPFirst linked Mar 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 44 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.38× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- Darren K. DeStefanoCooley LLPFirst linked Jul 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
- Kirk A. DavenportLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jan 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 52 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Stephane LevyCooley LLPFirst linked Jan 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alison HaggertyCooley LLP | Mar 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 44 | 0.38 | 0.00 | 0.75 |
| Darren K. DeStefanoCooley LLP | Jul 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 43 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.32 |
| Kirk A. DavenportLatham & Watkins LLP | Jan 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 52 | 0.77 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| Stephane LevyCooley LLP | Jan 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.78 |