Riverbed Technology, Inc. RVBD (last ticker on record)
CIK 1357326Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Nov 2012
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Nov 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Gunderson DettmerFirst linked Apr 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 333 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Apr 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Nov 2012 · Text search only · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Nov 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
| Gunderson Dettmer | Apr 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 333 | 1.17 | 0.66 | 1.32 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Apr 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
| Davis Polk | Nov 2012 | Text search only | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Keith FlaumHogan Lovells US LLPFirst linked Nov 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- James R. GriffinWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Nov 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.67×
- Keith A. FlaumCooley LLPFirst linked Nov 2012 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.78× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Richard C. BlakeGunderson DettmerFirst linked Feb 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.22× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- David J. SegreWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Mar 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.60×
- Richard A. KlineGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Mar 2008 · Named in a filing · 56 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- David W. Van Horne Jr.Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Feb 2007 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.49× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Craig M. SchmitzGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Apr 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.41× · Went dark 3.35× · 95% wipeout 2.18×
- Robert V. Gunderson Jr.Gunderson DettmerFirst linked Apr 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.18×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Keith FlaumHogan Lovells US LLP | Nov 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 1.13 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| James R. GriffinWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Nov 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 46 | 1.28 | 0.00 | 0.67 |
| Keith A. FlaumCooley LLP | Nov 2012 | Named in a filing | 25 | 1.78 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Richard C. BlakeGunderson Dettmer | Feb 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 39 | 1.22 | 0.00 | 1.06 |
| David J. SegreWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Mar 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 55 | 1.33 | 0.00 | 1.60 |
| Richard A. KlineGoodwin Procter | Mar 2008 | Named in a filing | 56 | 1.10 | 0.00 | 1.20 |
| David W. Van Horne Jr.Goodwin Procter | Feb 2007 | Named in a filing | 5 | 1.49 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Craig M. SchmitzGoodwin Procter | Apr 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 1.41 | 3.35 | 2.18 |
| Robert V. Gunderson Jr.Gunderson Dettmer | Apr 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 37 | 2.00 | 0.00 | 2.18 |