Express Scripts WC, Inc.
CIK 1357234Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked Mar 2006 · Named in a filing · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Nov 2012 · Text search only · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Akerman LLPFirst linked Mar 2006 · Text search only · 211 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Mar 2006 · Text search only · 1,688 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Mar 2006 · Text search only · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Schiff HardinFirst linked Mar 2006 · Text search only · 184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Mar 2006 · Text search only · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ropes & Gray | Mar 2006 | Named in a filing | 914 | 0.97 | 0.14 | 0.91 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Nov 2012 | Text search only | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.82 |
| Akerman LLP | Mar 2006 | Text search only | 211 | 1.09 | 0.67 | 1.39 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Mar 2006 | Text search only | 1,688 | 0.97 | 0.17 | 0.86 |
| Morgan Lewis | Mar 2006 | Text search only | 1,028 | 1.17 | 0.31 | 1.01 |
| Schiff Hardin | Mar 2006 | Text search only | 184 | 0.78 | 0.85 | 1.23 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Mar 2006 | Text search only | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Stacy J. KanterSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Nov 2012 · Text search only · 73 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.60× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 0.58×
- Michael H. WeedKirkland & EllisFirst linked Mar 2006 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stacy J. KanterSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Nov 2012 | Text search only | 73 | 1.60 | 0.31 | 0.58 |
| Michael H. WeedKirkland & Ellis | Mar 2006 | Text search only | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |