CPG INTERNATIONAL INC.
CIK 1356711Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Aug 2006
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Fried FrankFirst linked May 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 540 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked May 2006 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked May 2006 · Text search only · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked May 2006 · Text search only · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fried Frank | May 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 540 | 1.33 | 0.24 | 0.94 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | May 2006 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| Goodwin Procter | May 2006 | Text search only | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | May 2006 | Text search only | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Andrew B. BarkanFried FrankFirst linked Apr 2009 · Named in a filing · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.58×
- Stuart H. GelfondFried FrankFirst linked May 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 50 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Christopher EwanFried FrankFirst linked May 2006 · Text search only · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.70× · Went dark 0.88× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Luis R. PenalverCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked May 2006 · Text search only · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.63×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrew B. BarkanFried Frank | Apr 2009 | Named in a filing | 24 | 0.72 | 0.00 | 1.58 |
| Stuart H. GelfondFried Frank | May 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 50 | 1.09 | 0.00 | 1.01 |
| Christopher EwanFried Frank | May 2006 | Text search only | 29 | 0.70 | 0.88 | 0.00 |
| Luis R. PenalverCahill Gordon & Reindel | May 2006 | Text search only | 13 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.63 |