SUPERNUS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. SUPN (last ticker on record)
CIK 1356576Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Nov 2025
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Far more SEC letters than usualSEC letter (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Saul EwingFirst linked Feb 2011 · Named in a filing · 100 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.22× · Went dark 1.01× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Dec 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked Dec 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Foley & LardnerFirst linked Apr 2012 · Text search only · 498 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Akin GumpFirst linked Feb 2012 · Text search only · 582 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Feb 2011 · Text search only · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Feb 2011 · Text search only · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Pillsbury WinthropFirst linked Feb 2011 · Text search only · 516 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Hogan & HartsonFirst linked Dec 2010 · Text search only · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.30× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saul Ewing | Feb 2011 | Named in a filing | 100 | 1.22 | 1.01 | 1.14 |
| Goodwin Procter | Dec 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Ropes & Gray | Dec 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 914 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 0.92 |
| Foley & Lardner | Apr 2012 | Text search only | 498 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 1.02 |
| Akin Gump | Feb 2012 | Text search only | 582 | 1.24 | 0.52 | 1.25 |
| Davis Polk | Feb 2011 | Text search only | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| DLA Piper | Feb 2011 | Text search only | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Pillsbury Winthrop | Feb 2011 | Text search only | 516 | 1.13 | 0.82 | 1.27 |
| Hogan & Hartson | Dec 2010 | Text search only | 390 | 1.03 | 0.30 | 1.18 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- George A. NayaSaul EwingFirst linked Jun 2024 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.56×
- Mark I. GruhinSaul EwingFirst linked Feb 2011 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.44× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.52×
- Edward A. KingGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Dec 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Mitchell S. BloomGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Dec 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 109 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.38× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Paul KinsellaRopes & GrayFirst linked Dec 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.70× · Went dark 0.39× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- John K. KnightDavis PolkFirst linked Mar 2012 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| George A. NayaSaul Ewing | Jun 2024 | Named in a filing | 6 | 3.36 | 0.00 | 0.56 |
| Mark I. GruhinSaul Ewing | Feb 2011 | Named in a filing | 5 | 2.44 | 0.00 | 0.52 |
| Edward A. KingGoodwin Procter | Dec 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 0.69 | 0.00 | 1.36 |
| Mitchell S. BloomGoodwin Procter | Dec 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 109 | 0.38 | 0.00 | 1.03 |
| Paul KinsellaRopes & Gray | Dec 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 54 | 1.70 | 0.39 | 0.66 |
| John K. KnightDavis Polk | Mar 2012 | Text search only | 6 | 0.79 | 0.00 | 0.00 |