Yucheng Technologies LTD YTEC (last ticker on record)
CIK 1356462Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Aug 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Aug 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Golenbock Eiseman Assor Bell & Peskoe LLPFirst linked Oct 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.59× · Went dark 1.50× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- Graubard MillerFirst linked Mar 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 418 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Harney Westwood & RiegelsFirst linked Mar 2006 · Named in a filing · 238 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 1.02× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked Mar 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 439 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Troutman Sanders LLPFirst linked Oct 2012 · Text search only · 335 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Jingtian & Gongcheng Attorneys at LawFirst linked Aug 2012 · Text search only · 79 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 1.13× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Sep 2006 · Text search only · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Aug 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Aug 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 741 | 1.31 | 0.12 | 0.76 |
| Golenbock Eiseman Assor Bell & Peskoe LLP | Oct 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 55 | 0.59 | 1.50 | 1.41 |
| Graubard Miller | Mar 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 418 | 0.92 | 0.75 | 1.16 |
| Harney Westwood & Riegels | Mar 2006 | Named in a filing | 238 | 1.34 | 1.02 | 0.76 |
| Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | Mar 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 439 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 0.76 |
| Troutman Sanders LLP | Oct 2012 | Text search only | 335 | 1.15 | 0.61 | 1.16 |
| Jingtian & Gongcheng Attorneys at Law | Aug 2012 | Text search only | 79 | 1.11 | 1.13 | 0.88 |
| DLA Piper | Sep 2006 | Text search only | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ling HuangCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Aug 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.59× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Michael V. GisserSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Aug 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Peter X. HuangSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked May 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 51 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.17×
- Andrew D. HuddersGolenbock Eiseman Assor Bell & Peskoe LLPFirst linked Oct 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 53 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.70× · Went dark 1.65× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
- David MillerLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Oct 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.49× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- David Alan MillerEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Mar 2006 · Named in a filing · 231 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.74× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
- Henry LesserDLA PiperFirst linked Sep 2006 · Text search only · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.74×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling HuangCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Aug 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 0.59 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Michael V. GisserSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Aug 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 22 | 0.36 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Peter X. HuangSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | May 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 51 | 0.26 | 0.00 | 0.17 |
| Andrew D. HuddersGolenbock Eiseman Assor Bell & Peskoe LLP | Oct 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 53 | 0.70 | 1.65 | 1.32 |
| David MillerLatham & Watkins LLP | Oct 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 1.49 | 0.00 | 1.17 |
| David Alan MillerEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Mar 2006 | Named in a filing | 231 | 1.06 | 0.74 | 1.33 |
| Henry LesserDLA Piper | Sep 2006 | Text search only | 16 | 0.69 | 0.00 | 0.74 |