CREATIVE REALITIES, INC. CREX (last ticker on record)
CIK 1356093Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jul 2013
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Taft Stettinius & HollisterFirst linked Aug 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 94 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.64× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Briggs and Morgan, P.A.First linked Aug 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.47× · Went dark 1.76× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Maslon Edelman Borman & Brand, LLPFirst linked Aug 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 88 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.83× · 95% wipeout 1.52×
- Locke LordFirst linked Nov 2021 · Text search only · 179 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.70× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Gracin & Marlow, LLPFirst linked Oct 2018 · Text search only · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 2.34× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Sep 2018 · Text search only · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Holland & HartFirst linked Apr 2014 · Text search only · 240 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 0.92× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Faegre & BensonFirst linked Aug 2006 · Text search only · 160 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taft Stettinius & Hollister | Aug 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 94 | 1.64 | 0.31 | 0.69 |
| Briggs and Morgan, P.A. | Aug 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 39 | 0.47 | 1.76 | 1.00 |
| Maslon Edelman Borman & Brand, LLP | Aug 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 88 | 0.65 | 0.83 | 1.52 |
| Locke Lord | Nov 2021 | Text search only | 179 | 1.70 | 0.54 | 1.00 |
| Gracin & Marlow, LLP | Oct 2018 | Text search only | 55 | 0.97 | 2.34 | 1.38 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Sep 2018 | Text search only | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Holland & Hart | Apr 2014 | Text search only | 240 | 0.82 | 0.92 | 0.86 |
| Faegre & Benson | Aug 2006 | Text search only | 160 | 0.90 | 0.59 | 1.08 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kathleen EickTaft Stettinius & HollisterFirst linked Aug 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Bradley PedersonMaslon Edelman Borman & Brand, LLPFirst linked May 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Paul D. ChestovichMaslon Edelman Borman & Brand, LLPFirst linked Apr 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.72× · Went dark 1.17× · 95% wipeout 2.57×
- Alan M. GilbertMaslon Edelman Borman & Brand, LLPFirst linked Aug 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.96× · Went dark 1.14× · 95% wipeout 1.59×
- Brett D. AndersonBriggs and Morgan, P.A.First linked Aug 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.06× · 95% wipeout 0.46×
- William M. MowerMaslon Edelman Borman & Brand, LLPFirst linked Aug 2006 · Named in a filing · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.52× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.61×
- Gregory E. LindleyHolland & HartFirst linked Apr 2014 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.47× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kathleen EickTaft Stettinius & Hollister | Aug 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Bradley PedersonMaslon Edelman Borman & Brand, LLP | May 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Paul D. ChestovichMaslon Edelman Borman & Brand, LLP | Apr 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 1.72 | 1.17 | 2.57 |
| Alan M. GilbertMaslon Edelman Borman & Brand, LLP | Aug 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 1.96 | 1.14 | 1.59 |
| Brett D. AndersonBriggs and Morgan, P.A. | Aug 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 0.00 | 1.06 | 0.46 |
| William M. MowerMaslon Edelman Borman & Brand, LLP | Aug 2006 | Named in a filing | 30 | 0.52 | 0.75 | 1.61 |
| Gregory E. LindleyHolland & Hart | Apr 2014 | Text search only | 8 | 0.00 | 1.47 | 0.00 |