PRECIGEN, INC. PGEN (last ticker on record)
CIK 1356090Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- 95% wipeout
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began May 2020
- Largest fall in its shares
- 97%
- Aug 2015 to Mar 2020
- Law firms
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Davis PolkFirst linked Jul 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Hogan Lovells US LLPFirst linked Mar 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Thompson Hine LLPFirst linked Mar 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 208 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.64× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Troutman Sanders LLPFirst linked May 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 335 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Jones DayFirst linked Feb 2014 · Text search only · 686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked May 2013 · Text search only · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Gracin & Marlow, LLPFirst linked May 2013 · Text search only · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 2.34× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Maslon Edelman Borman & Brand, LLPFirst linked May 2013 · Text search only · 88 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.83× · 95% wipeout 1.52×
- Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLPFirst linked May 2013 · Text search only · 70 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.49× · Went dark 1.01× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked May 2013 · Text search only · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davis Polk | Jul 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Hogan Lovells US LLP | Mar 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 487 | 0.96 | 0.26 | 0.85 |
| Thompson Hine LLP | Mar 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 208 | 0.95 | 0.64 | 1.09 |
| Troutman Sanders LLP | May 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 335 | 1.15 | 0.61 | 1.16 |
| Jones Day | Feb 2014 | Text search only | 686 | 1.25 | 0.54 | 1.12 |
| Cooley LLP | May 2013 | Text search only | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Gracin & Marlow, LLP | May 2013 | Text search only | 55 | 0.97 | 2.34 | 1.38 |
| Maslon Edelman Borman & Brand, LLP | May 2013 | Text search only | 88 | 0.65 | 0.83 | 1.52 |
| Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP | May 2013 | Text search only | 70 | 0.49 | 1.01 | 1.37 |
| Greenberg Traurig | May 2013 | Text search only | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Deanna L. KirkpatrickDavis PolkFirst linked Dec 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 112 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.74× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Asher M. RubinHogan Lovells US LLPFirst linked May 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.54× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- William I. IntnerHogan Lovells US LLPFirst linked Mar 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.58× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- David I. MeyersTroutman Sanders LLPFirst linked May 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.12× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Alan M. GilbertMaslon Edelman Borman & Brand, LLPFirst linked May 2013 · Text search only · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.96× · Went dark 1.14× · 95% wipeout 1.59×
- Mark A. CatchurShumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLPFirst linked May 2013 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.57× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.26×
- Robert L. JonesCooley LLPFirst linked May 2013 · Text search only · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deanna L. KirkpatrickDavis Polk | Dec 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 112 | 1.74 | 0.00 | 0.76 |
| Asher M. RubinHogan Lovells US LLP | May 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 25 | 0.54 | 0.00 | 0.85 |
| William I. IntnerHogan Lovells US LLP | Mar 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 31 | 0.58 | 0.00 | 1.15 |
| David I. MeyersTroutman Sanders LLP | May 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 2.12 | 0.00 | 1.20 |
| Alan M. GilbertMaslon Edelman Borman & Brand, LLP | May 2013 | Text search only | 18 | 1.96 | 1.14 | 1.59 |
| Mark A. CatchurShumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP | May 2013 | Text search only | 5 | 1.57 | 0.00 | 2.26 |
| Robert L. JonesCooley LLP | May 2013 | Text search only | 29 | 0.72 | 0.00 | 1.11 |