EMBRAER S.A. EMBJ (last ticker on record)
CIK 1355444Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Mar 2015
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 20-F (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 20-F (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 6-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked May 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 439 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Sep 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Mar 2006 · Named in a filing · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Mar 2007 · Text search only · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Walkers (Cayman)First linked Mar 2007 · Text search only · 191 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | May 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 439 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 0.76 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Sep 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Mar 2006 | Named in a filing | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Mar 2007 | Text search only | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Walkers (Cayman) | Mar 2007 | Text search only | 191 | 1.25 | 0.26 | 0.82 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Andrew B. JánszkyShearman & SterlingFirst linked Dec 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.01×
- Robert M. ChilstromSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jan 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.56× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Richard S. Aldrich Jr.Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Mar 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrew B. JánszkyShearman & Sterling | Dec 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 0.84 | 0.00 | 2.01 |
| Robert M. ChilstromSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jan 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 22 | 1.56 | 0.00 | 0.93 |
| Richard S. Aldrich Jr.Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Mar 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 1.08 | 0.00 | 0.00 |