Appgate, Inc. APGT (last ticker on record)
CIK 1353538Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Restatement
- 95% wipeout
- Bankruptcy
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 4
- Newest began May 2024
- Largest fall in its shares
- 98%
- Mar 2022 to Dec 2023
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Dec 2021 · Named in a filing · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Eaton & Van Winkle LLPFirst linked Jun 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 49 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.35× · Went dark 1.45× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Graubard MillerFirst linked Jan 2022 · Text search only · 418 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Phillips Nizer LLPFirst linked Jun 2006 · Text search only · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 1.85× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greenberg Traurig | Dec 2021 | Named in a filing | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| Eaton & Van Winkle LLP | Jun 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 49 | 0.35 | 1.45 | 1.17 |
| Graubard Miller | Jan 2022 | Text search only | 418 | 0.92 | 0.75 | 1.16 |
| Phillips Nizer LLP | Jun 2006 | Text search only | 45 | 0.98 | 1.85 | 0.83 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Drew M. AltmanGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Dec 2021 · Named in a filing · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.83× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.53×
- Vincent J. McGillEaton & Van Winkle LLPFirst linked Jun 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.34× · Went dark 2.27× · 95% wipeout 1.56×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drew M. AltmanGreenberg Traurig | Dec 2021 | Named in a filing | 23 | 1.83 | 0.00 | 1.53 |
| Vincent J. McGillEaton & Van Winkle LLP | Jun 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 28 | 0.34 | 2.27 | 1.56 |