LoopNet, Inc. LOOP (last ticker on record)
CIK 1353209Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Feb 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 500 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Heller EhrmanFirst linked Mar 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 256 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked Mar 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 825 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLPFirst linked Apr 2006 · Text search only · 98 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
- Berenbaum Weinshienk PCFirst linked Mar 2006 · Text search only · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 0.63× · 95% wipeout 1.65×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Feb 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 500 | 1.12 | 0.61 | 1.08 |
| Heller Ehrman | Mar 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 256 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.96 |
| Morrison & Foerster | Mar 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 825 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.15 |
| Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP | Apr 2006 | Text search only | 98 | 0.65 | 0.85 | 1.34 |
| Berenbaum Weinshienk PC | Mar 2006 | Text search only | 12 | 0.82 | 0.63 | 1.65 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Justin L. BastianMorrison & FoersterFirst linked Mar 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.30× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Karen A. DempseyOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Mar 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.41× · Went dark 1.24× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Justin L. BastianMorrison & Foerster | Mar 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 23 | 0.30 | 1.12 | 0.92 |
| Karen A. DempseyOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Mar 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 24 | 1.41 | 1.24 | 1.00 |