ELANDIA INTERNATIONAL INC.
CIK 1352819Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Jan 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Carlton FieldsFirst linked Feb 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Adorno & Yoss, P.A.First linked Feb 2006 · Named in a filing · 49 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.62× · Went dark 1.01× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2007 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Borden Ladner Gervais LLPFirst linked Feb 2006 · Text search only · 78 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.46× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPFirst linked Feb 2006 · Text search only · 130 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Husch & EppenbergerFirst linked Feb 2006 · Text search only · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.93×
- WRIGHT, LINDSEY & JENNINGSFirst linked Feb 2006 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.90× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carlton Fields | Feb 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 47 | 1.34 | 0.44 | 1.13 |
| Adorno & Yoss, P.A. | Feb 2006 | Named in a filing | 49 | 1.62 | 1.01 | 1.22 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2007 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Borden Ladner Gervais LLP | Feb 2006 | Text search only | 78 | 0.46 | 0.00 | 1.25 |
| Davis Wright Tremaine LLP | Feb 2006 | Text search only | 130 | 0.97 | 0.59 | 1.27 |
| Husch & Eppenberger | Feb 2006 | Text search only | 26 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.93 |
| WRIGHT, LINDSEY & JENNINGS | Feb 2006 | Text search only | 10 | 0.00 | 1.90 | 0.00 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Seth P. JosephBaker & McKenzieFirst linked Feb 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.54× · Went dark 1.78× · 95% wipeout 2.22×
- Patrick H. ShannonLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2007 · Text search only · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.75×
- Blake Dawson WaldronFirst linked Feb 2006 · Text search only · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.58× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.35×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seth P. JosephBaker & McKenzie | Feb 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 2.54 | 1.78 | 2.22 |
| Patrick H. ShannonLatham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2007 | Text search only | 32 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.75 |
| Blake Dawson Waldron | Feb 2006 | Text search only | 12 | 0.58 | 0.00 | 2.35 |