EPAM Systems, Inc. EPAM (last ticker on record)
CIK 1352010Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Davis PolkFirst linked Jun 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Baker & DanielsFirst linked Jun 2011 · Text search only · 129 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Jun 2011 · Text search only · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Drinker Biddle & ReathFirst linked Jun 2011 · Text search only · 213 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Jun 2011 · Text search only · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davis Polk | Jun 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Baker & Daniels | Jun 2011 | Text search only | 129 | 1.11 | 0.45 | 1.22 |
| DLA Piper | Jun 2011 | Text search only | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Drinker Biddle & Reath | Jun 2011 | Text search only | 213 | 1.46 | 0.77 | 1.25 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Jun 2011 | Text search only | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Stephen A. ByeffDavis PolkFirst linked Nov 2026 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Veronica M. WisselDavis PolkFirst linked Sep 2021 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Jean M. McLoughlinDavis PolkFirst linked Feb 2012 · Named in a filing · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.41×
- Joseph A. HallDavis PolkFirst linked Jun 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 49 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Jonathan KleinDLA PiperFirst linked Jun 2011 · Text search only · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.12×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stephen A. ByeffDavis Polk | Nov 2026 | Named in a filing | 14 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.87 |
| Veronica M. WisselDavis Polk | Sep 2021 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.12 |
| Jean M. McLoughlinDavis Polk | Feb 2012 | Named in a filing | 24 | 1.27 | 0.00 | 0.41 |
| Joseph A. HallDavis Polk | Jun 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 49 | 1.14 | 0.00 | 0.82 |
| Jonathan KleinDLA Piper | Jun 2011 | Text search only | 13 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.12 |