China Information Technology, Inc. CNIT (last ticker on record)
CIK 1350684Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Zhong Lun Law FirmFirst linked Aug 2009 · Named in a filing · 90 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Holland & HartFirst linked May 2009 · Named in a filing · 240 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 0.92× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Pillsbury WinthropFirst linked May 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 516 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Broad and CasselFirst linked Apr 2007 · Named in a filing · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 1.05× · 95% wipeout 1.93×
- Thelen Reid Brown Raysman & Steiner LLPFirst linked Apr 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.75× · Went dark 1.63× · 95% wipeout 1.56×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zhong Lun Law Firm | Aug 2009 | Named in a filing | 90 | 0.53 | 0.00 | 0.90 |
| Holland & Hart | May 2009 | Named in a filing | 240 | 0.82 | 0.92 | 0.86 |
| Pillsbury Winthrop | May 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 516 | 1.13 | 0.82 | 1.27 |
| Broad and Cassel | Apr 2007 | Named in a filing | 58 | 1.13 | 1.05 | 1.93 |
| Thelen Reid Brown Raysman & Steiner LLP | Apr 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 54 | 0.75 | 1.63 | 1.56 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Dawn Bernd-SchulzPillsbury WinthropFirst linked Mar 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 1.89× · 95% wipeout 1.71×
- Joseph R. TianoPillsbury WinthropFirst linked May 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 3.08× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Louis A. BevilacquaBevilacqua PLLCFirst linked May 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 103 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 1.97× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Thomas M. ShoesmithPillsbury WinthropFirst linked Apr 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 2.68× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- Diane J. HarrisonHarrison LawFirst linked Mar 2006 · Named in a filing · 63 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.80× · Went dark 1.55× · 95% wipeout 1.05×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dawn Bernd-SchulzPillsbury Winthrop | Mar 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 0.66 | 1.89 | 1.71 |
| Joseph R. TianoPillsbury Winthrop | May 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 27 | 0.79 | 3.08 | 1.14 |
| Louis A. BevilacquaBevilacqua PLLC | May 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 103 | 0.92 | 1.97 | 1.30 |
| Thomas M. ShoesmithPillsbury Winthrop | Apr 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 23 | 1.08 | 2.68 | 1.41 |
| Diane J. HarrisonHarrison Law | Mar 2006 | Named in a filing | 63 | 1.80 | 1.55 | 1.05 |