American Standard Energy Corp. ASEN (last ticker on record)
CIK 1349976Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Bankruptcy
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Sep 2015
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PCFirst linked Feb 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 149 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 1.18× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Blank RomeFirst linked Aug 2011 · Named in a filing · 348 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.79× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- ANSLOW & JACLIN, LLPFirst linked Oct 2010 · Named in a filing · 375 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 1.40× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC | Feb 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 149 | 0.72 | 1.18 | 1.15 |
| Blank Rome | Aug 2011 | Named in a filing | 348 | 1.04 | 0.79 | 1.36 |
| ANSLOW & JACLIN, LLP | Oct 2010 | Named in a filing | 375 | 1.17 | 1.40 | 0.93 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Tonya Mitchem GrindonBaker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PCFirst linked Feb 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.54× · Went dark 1.24× · 95% wipeout 2.03×
- Kathleen A. CunninghamBlank RomeFirst linked Jan 2012 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.79× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- Kristina TraugerShearman & SterlingFirst linked Aug 2011 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.15× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- Gregg E. JaclinANSLOW & JACLIN, LLPFirst linked Feb 2011 · Named in a filing · 338 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.39× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Gary S. EatonANSLOW & JACLIN, LLPFirst linked Oct 2010 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.88× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.54×
- Kristina L. TraugerANSLOW & JACLIN, LLPFirst linked Oct 2010 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 2.40× · 95% wipeout 0.51×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tonya Mitchem GrindonBaker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC | Feb 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 2.54 | 1.24 | 2.03 |
| Kathleen A. CunninghamBlank Rome | Jan 2012 | Named in a filing | 9 | 2.79 | 0.00 | 1.44 |
| Kristina TraugerShearman & Sterling | Aug 2011 | Named in a filing | 13 | 2.15 | 0.00 | 1.44 |
| Gregg E. JaclinANSLOW & JACLIN, LLP | Feb 2011 | Named in a filing | 338 | 1.23 | 1.39 | 0.89 |
| Gary S. EatonANSLOW & JACLIN, LLP | Oct 2010 | Named in a filing | 16 | 1.88 | 0.45 | 1.54 |
| Kristina L. TraugerANSLOW & JACLIN, LLP | Oct 2010 | Named in a filing | 15 | 0.00 | 2.40 | 0.51 |