Fortissimo Acquisition Corp. FSMO (last ticker on record)
CIK 1349318Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Potter Anderson & CorroonFirst linked Jul 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 127 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.41× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Proskauer RoseFirst linked Jan 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 1.05×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Feb 2008 · Text search only · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Feb 2008 · Text search only · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Graubard MillerFirst linked Jan 2006 · Text search only · 418 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Jan 2006 · Text search only · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Potter Anderson & Corroon | Jul 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 127 | 1.41 | 0.45 | 0.83 |
| Proskauer Rose | Jan 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 492 | 1.15 | 0.48 | 1.05 |
| HALE AND DORR | Feb 2008 | Text search only | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.22 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Feb 2008 | Text search only | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.23 |
| Graubard Miller | Jan 2006 | Text search only | 418 | 0.92 | 0.75 | 1.15 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Jan 2006 | Text search only | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.89 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Brian B. MargolisHunter Taubman FischerFirst linked Jan 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.69× · Went dark 0.96× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
- David Alan MillerEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Jan 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 231 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.74× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Ori SolomonProskauer RoseFirst linked Jan 2006 · Text search only · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.75× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brian B. MargolisHunter Taubman Fischer | Jan 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 35 | 0.69 | 0.96 | 1.29 |
| David Alan MillerEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Jan 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 231 | 1.06 | 0.74 | 1.28 |
| Ori SolomonProskauer Rose | Jan 2006 | Text search only | 20 | 0.75 | 0.00 | 1.29 |