SMART MOVE, INC. MVE (last ticker on record)
CIK 1349108Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began May 2009
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Messner & Reeves, LLCFirst linked Oct 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Cozen O'Connor P.C.First linked Feb 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 163 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.63× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Moye White LLPFirst linked Feb 2006 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.38×
- Sherman & Howard L.L.C.First linked Feb 2006 · Text search only · 105 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.48×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Messner & Reeves, LLC | Oct 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 1.23 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Cozen O'Connor P.C. | Feb 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 163 | 1.03 | 0.63 | 0.94 |
| Moye White LLP | Feb 2006 | Named in a filing | 18 | 0.90 | 0.00 | 0.38 |
| Sherman & Howard L.L.C. | Feb 2006 | Text search only | 105 | 1.02 | 0.99 | 1.48 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David C. RoosMoye White LLPFirst linked Feb 2006 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.32× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- F. Alec OrudjevSchiff HardinFirst linked Feb 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.18× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Melissa L. MongPatton BoggsFirst linked Feb 2006 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 0.84× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Ralph V. De MartinoArentFox Schiff LLPFirst linked Feb 2006 · Named in a filing · 78 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.51× · Went dark 1.20× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David C. RoosMoye White LLP | Feb 2006 | Named in a filing | 12 | 1.32 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| F. Alec OrudjevSchiff Hardin | Feb 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 23 | 0.00 | 1.18 | 1.28 |
| Melissa L. MongPatton Boggs | Feb 2006 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.76 | 0.84 | 1.10 |
| Ralph V. De MartinoArentFox Schiff LLP | Feb 2006 | Named in a filing | 78 | 0.51 | 1.20 | 1.38 |