HD Partners Acquisition CORP HDP (last ticker on record)
CIK 1347006Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Dec 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 964 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked May 2006 · Text search only · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2005 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Piper RudnickFirst linked Dec 2005 · Text search only · 183 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Dec 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 964 | 0.95 | 1.12 | 1.21 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | May 2006 | Text search only | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.78 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2005 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.08 |
| Piper Rudnick | Dec 2005 | Text search only | 183 | 1.09 | 0.37 | 0.78 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Brian C. DaughneyBecker & Poliakoff LLPFirst linked Sep 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 1.71× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
- Michael A. MiduraEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Apr 2006 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.71× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.94×
- Stuart NeuhauserEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Apr 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 417 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.42× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Douglas S. EllenoffEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Dec 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 339 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Jody R. SamuelsRichardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Dec 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.10× · Went dark 1.37× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Daniel I. GoldbergCooley LLPFirst linked Dec 2005 · Text search only · 184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brian C. DaughneyBecker & Poliakoff LLP | Sep 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 37 | 1.25 | 1.71 | 1.49 |
| Michael A. MiduraEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Apr 2006 | Named in a filing | 7 | 2.71 | 0.00 | 1.94 |
| Stuart NeuhauserEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Apr 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 417 | 0.79 | 0.42 | 1.02 |
| Douglas S. EllenoffEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Dec 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 339 | 0.95 | 0.66 | 0.96 |
| Jody R. SamuelsRichardson & Patel LLP | Dec 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 2.10 | 1.37 | 1.38 |
| Daniel I. GoldbergCooley LLP | Dec 2005 | Text search only | 184 | 0.64 | 0.00 | 1.02 |