iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Investing Pool LLC
CIK 1346616Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked May 2006 · Named in a filing · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Dec 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 742 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Apr 2013 · Text search only · 1,397 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Apr 2013 · Text search only · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked May 2006 · Text search only · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | May 2006 | Named in a filing | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.78 |
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Dec 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 742 | 1.30 | 0.12 | 0.72 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Apr 2013 | Text search only | 1,397 | 1.27 | 0.11 | 0.88 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Apr 2013 | Text search only | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.82 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | May 2006 | Text search only | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.66 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Raymond B. CheckCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Jul 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.10× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.67×
- Edward J. RosenCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Dec 2005 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raymond B. CheckCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Jul 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 3.10 | 0.00 | 0.67 |
| Edward J. RosenCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Dec 2005 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |