ULTHERA INC
CIK 1345889Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,669 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Quarles & BradyFirst linked Apr 2014 · Text search only · 170 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.70× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Ballard SpahrFirst linked Feb 2014 · Text search only · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.06× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Feb 2014 · Text search only · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,669 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.08 |
| Quarles & Brady | Apr 2014 | Text search only | 170 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.76 |
| Ballard Spahr | Feb 2014 | Text search only | 492 | 1.23 | 1.06 | 0.78 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Feb 2014 | Text search only | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.41 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Alan C. MendelsonLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 95 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.60× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Kathleen M. WellsLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Haim ZaltzmanLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2014 · Text search only · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.59×
- J. CASEY MCGLYNNWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Feb 2014 · Text search only · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.52× · Went dark 0.43× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Luke J. BergstromLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2014 · Text search only · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.55× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Philip H. OettingerWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Feb 2014 · Text search only · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.47× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.48×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alan C. MendelsonLatham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 95 | 0.60 | 0.19 | 1.28 |
| Kathleen M. WellsLatham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 35 | 0.86 | 0.00 | 1.09 |
| Haim ZaltzmanLatham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2014 | Text search only | 27 | 1.25 | 0.00 | 1.59 |
| J. CASEY MCGLYNNWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Feb 2014 | Text search only | 36 | 0.52 | 0.43 | 1.12 |
| Luke J. BergstromLatham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2014 | Text search only | 18 | 0.55 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Philip H. OettingerWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Feb 2014 | Text search only | 24 | 0.47 | 1.03 | 1.48 |