Copa Holdings, S.A. CPA (last ticker on record)
CIK 1345105Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jul 2014
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Far more SEC letters than usualSEC letter (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Davis PolkFirst linked Mar 2010 · Named in a filing · 1,696 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Nov 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Nov 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,397 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Dec 2005 · Text search only · 1,224 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked Dec 2005 · Text search only · 439 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davis Polk | Mar 2010 | Named in a filing | 1,696 | 1.25 | 0.06 | 0.99 |
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Nov 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 741 | 1.30 | 0.12 | 0.72 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Nov 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,397 | 1.27 | 0.11 | 0.88 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Dec 2005 | Text search only | 1,224 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.12 |
| Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | Dec 2005 | Text search only | 439 | 1.01 | 0.35 | 0.70 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Manuel GarciadiazDavis PolkFirst linked Mar 2010 · Named in a filing · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Duane McLaughlinCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked May 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.35×
- Francesca L. OdellCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked May 2008 · Named in a filing · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.21× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- David L. WilliamsFaegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLPFirst linked Nov 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.79× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manuel GarciadiazDavis Polk | Mar 2010 | Named in a filing | 40 | 0.93 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| Duane McLaughlinCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | May 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 30 | 0.93 | 0.00 | 0.35 |
| Francesca L. OdellCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | May 2008 | Named in a filing | 33 | 2.21 | 0.00 | 0.91 |
| David L. WilliamsFaegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP | Nov 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 1.79 | 0.00 | 0.00 |