YELP INC YELP (last ticker on record)
CIK 1345016Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Apr 2020
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Nov 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Nov 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Gallagher & KennedyFirst linked Feb 2012 · Text search only · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.44× · Went dark 0.98× · 95% wipeout 1.05×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Nov 2011 · Text search only · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cooley LLP | Nov 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Davis Polk | Nov 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Gallagher & Kennedy | Feb 2012 | Text search only | 32 | 0.44 | 0.98 | 1.05 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Nov 2011 | Text search only | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Julia BoeschCooley LLPFirst linked May 2024 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Alan F. DenenbergDavis PolkFirst linked Feb 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 114 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.46×
- Craig D. JacobyCooley LLPFirst linked Nov 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.18×
- David PeinsippCooley LLPFirst linked Nov 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 86 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.55×
- Kenneth L. GuernseyCooley LLPFirst linked Nov 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 51 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.56× · Went dark 0.49× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julia BoeschCooley LLP | May 2024 | Named in a filing | 14 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.30 |
| Alan F. DenenbergDavis Polk | Feb 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 114 | 1.19 | 0.00 | 1.46 |
| Craig D. JacobyCooley LLP | Nov 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.18 |
| David PeinsippCooley LLP | Nov 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 86 | 1.13 | 0.00 | 1.55 |
| Kenneth L. GuernseyCooley LLP | Nov 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 51 | 0.56 | 0.49 | 1.38 |