Pregis Holding II CORP
CIK 1344494Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Aug 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- McGuireWoods LLPFirst linked Oct 2009 · Named in a filing · 358 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Fried FrankFirst linked Dec 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 540 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Mayer BrownFirst linked Feb 2006 · Text search only · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Torys LLPFirst linked Feb 2006 · Text search only · 170 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.22× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jan 2006 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Morris JamesFirst linked Dec 2005 · Text search only · 95 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.62× · Went dark 0.42× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| McGuireWoods LLP | Oct 2009 | Named in a filing | 358 | 0.97 | 0.85 | 1.11 |
| Fried Frank | Dec 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 540 | 1.33 | 0.24 | 0.94 |
| Mayer Brown | Feb 2006 | Text search only | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.94 |
| Torys LLP | Feb 2006 | Text search only | 170 | 1.22 | 0.44 | 0.94 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jan 2006 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Morris James | Dec 2005 | Text search only | 95 | 1.62 | 0.42 | 0.86 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Michael A. LevittFreshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLPFirst linked Dec 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.16× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- Andrew P. SchoefflerCovington & BurlingFirst linked Feb 2006 · Text search only · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 1.48× · 95% wipeout 2.13×
- Bradley P. CostHAYTHE & CURLEYFirst linked Feb 2006 · Text search only · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Christopher EwanFried FrankFirst linked Feb 2006 · Text search only · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.70× · Went dark 0.88× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael A. LevittFreshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLP | Dec 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 27 | 1.16 | 0.00 | 1.19 |
| Andrew P. SchoefflerCovington & Burling | Feb 2006 | Text search only | 12 | 0.82 | 1.48 | 2.13 |
| Bradley P. CostHAYTHE & CURLEY | Feb 2006 | Text search only | 12 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.86 |
| Christopher EwanFried Frank | Feb 2006 | Text search only | 29 | 0.70 | 0.88 | 0.00 |