Stanley-Martin Communities, LLC
CIK 1344478Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Arent FoxFirst linked Dec 2005 · Named in a filing · 90 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.94× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jan 2006 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Dec 2005 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Emmet Marvin & MartinFirst linked Dec 2005 · Text search only · 199 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.81× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Dec 2005 · Text search only · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Venable LLPFirst linked Dec 2005 · Text search only · 506 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arent Fox | Dec 2005 | Named in a filing | 90 | 0.94 | 0.94 | 0.91 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jan 2006 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Dec 2005 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| Emmet Marvin & Martin | Dec 2005 | Text search only | 199 | 0.81 | 0.16 | 0.85 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Dec 2005 | Text search only | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Venable LLP | Dec 2005 | Text search only | 506 | 0.79 | 0.38 | 0.73 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jeffrey E. JordanArent FoxFirst linked Dec 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.48× · Went dark 2.20× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Daniel J. ZubkoffCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Dec 2005 · Text search only · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.38× · Went dark 1.69× · 95% wipeout 0.58×
- John B. TehanSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Dec 2005 · Text search only · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.25× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- OR FORMATIONSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Dec 2005 · Text search only · 160 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey E. JordanArent Fox | Dec 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 0.48 | 2.20 | 1.10 |
| Daniel J. ZubkoffCahill Gordon & Reindel | Dec 2005 | Text search only | 17 | 1.38 | 1.69 | 0.58 |
| John B. TehanSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Dec 2005 | Text search only | 33 | 2.25 | 0.00 | 0.59 |
| OR FORMATIONSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Dec 2005 | Text search only | 160 | 1.27 | 0.15 | 0.90 |