Ternium S.A. TX (last ticker on record)
CIK 1342874Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Oct 2010
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Far more SEC letters than usualSEC letter (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Elvinger, Hoss & PrussenFirst linked Jan 2006 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.34×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Jan 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Jan 2006 · Text search only · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Conyers Dill & PearmanFirst linked Jan 2006 · Text search only · 531 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Emmet Marvin & MartinFirst linked Jan 2006 · Text search only · 199 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.81× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elvinger, Hoss & Prussen | Jan 2006 | Named in a filing | 10 | 1.65 | 0.00 | 2.34 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Jan 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Jan 2006 | Text search only | 741 | 1.31 | 0.12 | 0.76 |
| Conyers Dill & Pearman | Jan 2006 | Text search only | 531 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 1.16 |
| Emmet Marvin & Martin | Jan 2006 | Text search only | 199 | 0.81 | 0.16 | 0.85 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Patrick S. BrownSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Jul 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Robert S. RisoleoSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Dec 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 2.55× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- John F. KennedyFirst linked Jan 2006 · Text search only · 190 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.52× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Luis A. NicolauCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Jan 2006 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patrick S. BrownSullivan & Cromwell | Jul 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 37 | 0.99 | 0.00 | 1.18 |
| Robert S. RisoleoSullivan & Cromwell | Dec 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 0.64 | 2.55 | 1.44 |
| John F. Kennedy | Jan 2006 | Text search only | 190 | 1.52 | 0.60 | 1.17 |
| Luis A. NicolauCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Jan 2006 | Text search only | 6 | 1.19 | 0.00 | 0.00 |