Limoneira CO LMNR (last ticker on record)
CIK 1342423Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLPFirst linked Sep 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 97 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.43× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Squire SandersFirst linked Mar 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 208 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.94× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Patton BoggsFirst linked Sep 2014 · Text search only · 186 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- Best Best & KriegerFirst linked Feb 2010 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP | Sep 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 97 | 0.43 | 0.00 | 0.73 |
| Squire Sanders | Mar 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 208 | 0.90 | 0.94 | 1.03 |
| Patton Boggs | Sep 2014 | Text search only | 186 | 0.92 | 0.76 | 1.31 |
| Best Best & Krieger | Feb 2010 | Text search only | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.89 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Alison N. LaBruyereSquire Patton Boggs (US) LLPFirst linked Jun 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Toby D. MerchantSquire Patton Boggs (US) LLPFirst linked Aug 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Stephen C. MahonSquire SandersFirst linked Mar 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.52× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Marc L. BrownTroyGould PCFirst linked Feb 2010 · Text search only · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alison N. LaBruyereSquire Patton Boggs (US) LLP | Jun 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Toby D. MerchantSquire Patton Boggs (US) LLP | Aug 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Stephen C. MahonSquire Sanders | Mar 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 0.52 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Marc L. BrownTroyGould PC | Feb 2010 | Text search only | 15 | 1.17 | 0.00 | 1.21 |