Banks.com, Inc. BNNX (last ticker on record)
CIK 1341470Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jul 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Apr 2012 · Named in a filing · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Foley & LardnerFirst linked Nov 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 498 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Morris, Manning & Martin, LLPFirst linked Apr 2012 · Text search only · 105 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.58× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Akerman LLPFirst linked Sep 2006 · Text search only · 211 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greenberg Traurig | Apr 2012 | Named in a filing | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| Foley & Lardner | Nov 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 498 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 1.02 |
| Morris, Manning & Martin, LLP | Apr 2012 | Text search only | 105 | 0.58 | 0.34 | 0.86 |
| Akerman LLP | Sep 2006 | Text search only | 211 | 1.09 | 0.67 | 1.36 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gerald L. BaxterGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Apr 2012 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.89×
- Carrie LongFoley & LardnerFirst linked Jul 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Carolyn T. LongFoley & LardnerFirst linked Nov 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 1.66× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Martin A. TraberFoley & LardnerFirst linked Nov 2005 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.50× · Went dark 2.27× · 95% wipeout 1.55×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gerald L. BaxterGreenberg Traurig | Apr 2012 | Named in a filing | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.89 |
| Carrie LongFoley & Lardner | Jul 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| Carolyn T. LongFoley & Lardner | Nov 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 1.34 | 1.66 | 1.30 |
| Martin A. TraberFoley & Lardner | Nov 2005 | Named in a filing | 21 | 1.50 | 2.27 | 1.55 |