aTYR PHARMA INC ATYR (last ticker on record)
CIK 1339970Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Oct 2026
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Jun 2015 to Nov 2023
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Feb 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Dec 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Dec 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Duane MorrisFirst linked Jun 2019 · Text search only · 413 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 1.28× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Dec 2014 · Text search only · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cooley LLP | Feb 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Davis Polk | Dec 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Goodwin Procter | Dec 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Duane Morris | Jun 2019 | Text search only | 413 | 0.76 | 1.28 | 1.06 |
| DLA Piper | Dec 2014 | Text search only | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Katherine DenbyCooley LLPFirst linked Nov 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.50×
- Charles J. BairCooley LLPFirst linked Mar 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Sean M. ClaytonCooley LLPFirst linked Jan 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Alan F. DenenbergDavis PolkFirst linked Apr 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 114 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.46×
- Maggie L. WongGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Dec 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 2.17× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Daniel I. GoldbergCooley LLPFirst linked Jun 2016 · Text search only · 184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Kingsley L. TaftGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Dec 2014 · Text search only · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.51× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.47×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katherine DenbyCooley LLP | Nov 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.50 |
| Charles J. BairCooley LLP | Mar 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 26 | 0.86 | 0.00 | 0.94 |
| Sean M. ClaytonCooley LLP | Jan 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 28 | 0.73 | 0.00 | 1.38 |
| Alan F. DenenbergDavis Polk | Apr 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 114 | 1.19 | 0.00 | 1.46 |
| Maggie L. WongGoodwin Procter | Dec 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 0.00 | 2.17 | 0.98 |
| Daniel I. GoldbergCooley LLP | Jun 2016 | Text search only | 184 | 0.64 | 0.00 | 1.03 |
| Kingsley L. TaftGoodwin Procter | Dec 2014 | Text search only | 43 | 0.51 | 0.00 | 1.47 |